As it stands, its been nearly a year that expat retirement transfers of pensions have incurred a charge when moving to or between Qualifying Recognised Offshore Pension Schemes (QROPS), with only expats living within the European Union or a select group of 13 other countries immune to this charge.
However, British expats across the world have recently joined forces to question the fairness of the charge and to lobby parliament for its removal.
It\’s easy to see why they have taken this course of action – the charge for overseas expat retirement transfers comes in at 25% of the value of the pension fund; plainly a crippling and punitive amount for people who have already worked hard and paid their taxes in order to prudently fund their retirement.
According to statistics from HMRC, the average value of a QROPS transfer over the more than 11 years since April 2006 has been £93,087, and under the 25% rule, transfers of this value would attract a charge of £23,272. Surely this is too much. But given that since 2006 around 105,000 pension savers have between them transferred close to £10 billion as part of QROPS arrangements it is easy to see why the government is reluctant to abandon such a lucrative tax.
Those behind a recent petition to the UK parliament certainly think so. The petition has labelled the charge as unfair and the creators have said it denies them the opportunity to make the most of their retirement savings.
The overseas transfer charge discriminates against expats outside the EEA in a country which does not host a QROPS, making them pay a 25% exit tax on moving their pension fund from the UK to a QROPS to gain better financial terms, said William Wilson, who lodged the petition on the website of UK parliament.
The charge is unreasonable as the rules punish QROPS members for financial planning when savers with other pensions, like Self-Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs), can live in the same place as a QROPS saver and suffer no transfer charge on moving their fund.
It is also a concern that the tax seems to push against the notion of self-determination regarding financial expat affairs. If the government is serious about allowing people to have both freedom of movement and freedom to decide their own financial affairs, wealth management and pension planning, they should not be discouraging them and in some cases debilitating them for making bold choices in regard to their pensions.
In order to generate responses from parliament the petition needs to be supported by at least 10,000 signatures by the time it closes on 19 July 2018, so it could still be some time before the issue receives the debate it clearly deserves.